Ex-president Trump remained persistent in amplifying the U.S. conflict against Mexican drug syndicates and endorsed harsher punishments for trafficking fentanyl and related narcotics within America’s borders. He expressed his support for extreme consequences, including capital punishment for those involved in drug trafficking, during a discussion with state governors in February. He highlighted the prevalent issue where drug traffickers often escape with mild punishments. However, President Trump’s stance has drawn criticism amidst concerns over the growing number of pardons issued to convicted drug traffickers.
During the early phase of his second term, Trump extended his leniency towards at least eight individuals who had prior convictions on federal drug-related offenses. Some of these individuals had heavy criminal records, inclusive of violent acts and firearms offenses. A policy analyst from a libertarian analytic institute expressed concern regarding the contradictory messages being sent by this approach – advocating for stricter penalties for drug dealers while simultaneously granting them freedom.
An interesting case pertaining to this situation is that of Larry Hoover and the Gangster Disciples. Ron Safer, a former U.S. attorney based in Chicago, who had actively participated in the prosecution of Gangster Disciples members in the 1990s, identified their cohort as one of the largest and brutal drug networks in the U.S. The U.S Justice Department determined their operations spanned across 35 states.
Larry Hoover, the leader of the gang, was charged with multiple state and federal crimes which included murder and utilization of firearms for drug trafficking. Safer belabored the sinister nature of Hoover’s network, describing it as ‘the most harmful, systematic drug operation in America’. The gang reportedly traded drugs over $100 million annually within Chicago alone, leading to innumerable deaths and wreaking havoc with ruthless violence.
Hoover first stepped into prison in 1973, with a conviction of murder. Subsequent to this, in the 1990s he was further sentenced with federal charges owing to his leadership in the Gangster Disciples. Currently, there are expectations of Hoover being transferred from his current residence in a federal supermax prison back to a state correctional establishment in Illinois. This is due to the still standing state-level murder conviction he has received.
Previously, Hoover had appealed for mercy to officials in Illinois but was frequently met with rejection. As recent as December 2022, a state review authority unanimously declined his latest proposal for parole. However, Trump’s act of granting clemency to Hoover along with several other drug offenders seems to fall in line with a trend which initiated during his first term in the White House.
While consistently vowings stronger action against drug traffickers, Trump, between 2017 and 2021, had forgiven or decreased the prison-sentences of at least 13 individuals with convictions of federal drug offenses. Ross Ulbricht, a previous tech entrepreneur currently serving a life sentence for establishing Silk Road, a dark web portal known to be a major pathway for drug buyers and sellers, was one of these individuals pardoned by Trump during the first month of his second term.
The federal prosecutors stated, after Ulbricht was judged in 2015, that he demonstrated a readiness to resort to violence in safeguarding his criminal enterprise and preserving the anonymity of its users. He was accused of soliciting a half dozen contract killings concerning the operation of his site. ‘The penalty does not always correlate with the seriousness of the crime,’ retorted a spokesman, emphasizing that the President is aware of the potential of these individuals to redeem themselves.
Certain critics, wary of the U.S. crackdown on drugs, cautiously lauded Trump’s use of presidential power to release drug offenders. The chief of the Drug Policy Alliance stated, ‘The chance of clemency being granted by President Trump to individuals with drug convictions gives much-needed relief to those affected. It also strengthens what communities have known for a while: that measures taken to criminalize drugs are nothing but detrimental.’
However, she took a combative stance against Trump’s wider perspective on drug policy. She pointed out a sharp contrast between individual acts of clemency and the administration’s overall punitive approach towards crime. Simultaneously, concerns have been raised about the ‘transactional’ nature of Trump’s pardons.
During his final tenure, former President Joe Biden pardoned a sea of convicts, many held for federal drug charges, reflecting his growing concern with the war on drugs. He called this action an important stride towards repairing historic missteps, rectifying sentencing disparities, and allowing deserving individuals to reunite with their families and communities after extended periods in captivity.
According to drug policy experts, it is challenging to discern a consistent philosophy behind Trump’s act of clemency. Based on an analyst’s insights, the pardons extended by Trump often seemed to be ‘transactional’, reflecting the influence of powerful benefactors to his political campaign.
During his campaign trail, Trump brazenly associated the idea of commuting Ulbricht’s sentence with his quest for the presidency: ‘If you lend me your vote, on my first day in the office, I’ll alter Ross Ulbricht’s life-term sentence to the amount of time he has already served,’ Trump announced, gaining the crowd’s approval.
The post Trump Supports Harsher Punishment for Drug Traffickers, Yet Grants Pardons appeared first on Real News Now.