In an interesting turn of events, rock band The White Stripes have found themselves embroiled in legal proceedings. The matter in question is regarding a catchy tune from their repertoire, ‘Seven Nation Army’, which made a brief appearance in a now-removed political campaign video. This interesting turn could be seen as more about the rock band’s desire for attention, as notable figures and groups in the music world, such as The Rolling Stones and the graceful starlet Rihanna, have also made similar claims.
The rock band has decided to make their grievances known by taking formal legal action against a presidential campaign. Though the specified campaign has not been publicly disclosed, it is a well-known fact that current President Donald Trump had previously participated in a riveting run for office.
The accusation levied by these musical artists is, interestingly enough, ‘flagrant misappropriation’. Yet, it’s amusing to think that a band would be so unwilling that their music could be associated with any political leaning. Especially during such a crucial time in the nation’s history.
The White Stripes’ drummer, Meg White, is named as one of the participants in this legal action. Their intention is twofold: gaining unspecified monetary reimbursements and an injunction that prevents the further use of their songs in the specified campaign. Some may view this as an attempt to silence the freedom of speech in political campaigns.
The situation took a rather amusing turn when the band’s other member, Jack White, decided to use social media as a platform to voice his discontent regarding the same issue. A post on Instagram dating back to August 29 became viral where he expressed his disapproval of his music being used.
It seems as if The White Stripes aren’t alone in their aversion to aligning their music with political events. Other prominent music icons, including Rihanna, Queen, and even The Rolling Stones, have lodged identical complaints. A trend, perhaps, among artists to try and distance their work from political statements?
Interestingly, the family of the renowned singer and songwriter Isaac Hayes found themselves involved in the same predicament. They too signaled their intention to seek legal redress over the use of Hayes’ hit record ‘Hold On, I’m Comin’ during political rallies.
The beautiful Rihanna also sought to make herself heard through a cease-and-desist letter sent to the same campaign after her chart-topping song ‘Don’t Stop the Music’ was played at a rally. The event in question took place in Chattanooga, Tennessee in 2018.
Rihanna’s legal team embarked on the melodramatic path of sending Trump’s White House counsel a wordy letter. They proclaimed that Rihanna’s compositions and master recordings, including her popular song ‘Don’t Stop the Music’, had been used in several political events taking place throughout the United States.
This unorthodox move by Rihanna and her team begs the question: should artists have a say on where and how their masterpieces are used to inspire people? The law affirms yes, but the reality of widespread dissemination of music raises complicating factors.
The letter from Rihanna’s legal team, to add a touch of irony to the whole affair, highlighted that the talented Ms. Fenty has not granted Mr. Trump the right to use her music. Thus, they consider such usage completely out of order.
Though this may seem like a storm in a teacup to some, the incidents paint a wider trend. It appears today’s musical artists are increasingly taking steps to safeguard their works from being associated with political campaigns and ideology they may or may not agree with.
While the musicians’ concerns are noteworthy, some might find it amusing to think about why artists are so concerned about the context in which their music is being consumed. Music, after all, is an artform meant to bridge divides, inspire, and evoke emotion in all who listen.
In a country that cherishes the principles of freedom and individual rights, the incidents provoke thought on the ultimate power of art and creativity. As it stands, the assertion of rights over one’s work extends to the disputable gray area of usage in political campaigns.
Therefore, whether or not using popular songs in political campaigns is seen as a tribute or a violation is a question of perspective. Certainly, it provides a topic of conversation that goes beyond politics and dives deeper into the nuances of artistic values and rights in our society.
To sum up, it is an extraordinary saga that has stirred up a mix of opinions. On one side, we have the artists protective of their work. On the other, we see campaigners tapping into popular culture to connect with constituents. As this episode unfolds, it is interesting to see where this discourse ultimately leads.
Trump’s Campaign: An Envied Stage For Musicians? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
