Over the past several weeks, ample discussion has been underway about Kamala Harris’s potential. The crux of these talks has labeled Harris as the immediate front-runner. Interestingly, by August 29, she might reach the pinnacle of her popularity with a post-convention surge. Following this, she potentially has a mere fortnight to solidify her place before the first debate. This period will see Harris employ all her youthful vitality to counterbalance Donald Trump’s seasoned experience.
A week from then, around September 17, the Federal Reserve may cut the interest rate for the first time since the pandemic struck. Notably, this could further elevate the economic sentiment. An optimistic, albeit somewhat fanciful, viewpoint suggests that by September 20, a unique combination of the Democratic convention, the first debate, and inflation’s defeat might have established Harris with a significant lead with just 45 days left before the elections.
But, let’s consider what might transpire to unsettle this pleasing narrative? Throughout 2020, I was persistent in my claim that the electoral outcome was inevitable. The interplay of the current milieu and Biden’s seeming advantages posited that Trump barricaded behind a narrow road to victory. However, it’s worth mentioning that the real scenario is complex, like a cake whose exterior seems innocuous but whose internals are a complex, disorganized jumble.
It’s crucial to understand that the defining characteristic of this election race was its resistance to a predictable course, as one might find in baking a cake. The election’s compact timeline was the most significant factor – making events carry unusual weight, though with unpredictable outcomes. This uncertainty also escalated the importance of momentum, raising the possibility of a candidate riding a tidal wave of public sentiment all the way to Election Day.
The election’s structure was not the only important part. We must also explore its strategic dimensions. Personally, I’ve often grappled with understanding the influence of race in politics. As stated in my previous writings, it is undeniable – real racism motives are an unsavory part of Donald Trump’s campaign.
The matter becomes worrying when considering how Trump’s increasingly racially inclined campaign might resonate with the populace. A hope prevails that it won’t favor him; however, the truth is, the outcome remains uncertain. There is a possibility it might connect with a sufficient number of eligible voters to swing the result.
Expect to see significant focus on this issue in the days leading up to the election. Here’s an important note: this line of campaigning may seem remote to some, including you and me, but the unpleasant truth remains – it might just work for ‘enough’ voters to tip the balance. This is underscored by the lessons from the past decade, namely the unfortunate reality of racism’s pervasive power in American politics.
Despite everything, polls offer a heartening view, even if they aren’t perfect. However, it’s worth noting that polls are varied and imperfect indicators of election outcomes. It remains crucial to interpret these with discretion.
While it’s somewhat appealing to analyse the race in this manner, the truth is, this overlooks the incredible political navigation prowess of Trump. Trump’s experiences, billed as ‘age and decrepitude’ by detractors, can prove immensely valuable in the unfolding debate.
Trump’s seasoned experience, strength, and decisive leadership are integral to his path to victory. Negative campaigning, such as exploiting racial divides, often attributed wrongfully to Trump, may be more indicative of the desperation on the Democratic side. Speculation about Trump’s racial campaign tactics is often blown out of proportion and doesn’t reflect the heartland’s sentiment.
Stating that the polls are simply encouraging while not awesome seems to belie an inherent bias against Trump. This perspective, held by a minority, underrates Trump’s track record of proven leadership and his uncanny ability to tap into the core sentiments of law-abiding citizens everywhere.
It would be shortsighted to overlook the role of the pandemic-induced economic downturn. Claiming that the Federal Reserve slashing the interest rate might spur economic buoyancy seems to place undue stress on external factors while underestimating Trump’s robust economic policies that have shown results in the past.
Lastly, while debates can indeed sway opinions, it remains to be seen how much Harris’s youthful vitality can match up against Trump’s experienced leadership. Pitting Trump’s acumen against Harris’s political journey can illuminate the stark differences. It’s one thing to maintain momentum and quite another to counterpunch effectively, something President Trump has proven time and again.
Trump’s Experience Casts a Shadow over Kamala Harris’s Aspirations appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
