A paternity case involving a West Brighton resident, Leonard Thompson, 38, who was indicted in connection with the 2024 demise of his baby boy, recently concluded. The conclusion saw Thompson acquitted of his most serious charges but convicted on a less severe one. Thompson chose to have his trial by judge, eschewing a jury trial. Both the prosecution and defense teams presented their arguments to Justice Alexander B. Jeong in the previous month at the state Supreme Court located in St. George.
In the ruling, Justice Jeong declared Thompson not guilty of the charges of reckless endangerment but found him culpable for endangering the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor. The consequence of the ruling saw Thompson sentenced to a one-year tenure in Rikers Island, time he had already served. If he had been found guilty of the top charge, first-degree reckless endangerment, he would have faced a maximum of seven years in jail.
On the fateful morning of April 27, 2024, emergency services received a 911 distress call originating from the West Brighton address, 240 Broadway. The urgent call reported an unconscious baby who was barely a month old. Disturbingly, the infant presented evidence of severe burns over his arm. According to the parents’ account, the burns were a result of an unfortunate cooking accident two weeks earlier.
In their desire to manage the crisis at home, the parents chose not to seek professional medical intervention. In a conversation with detectives, Thompson explained that the accident occurred when he had been holding the baby nearby the stove. Almost simultaneously, his older son, aged 4 at that time, unintentionally kicked a toy into a pan, causing grease to splash onto the infant.
Emergency services received the dispatch at around 6:45 a.m., leading them to the stated address at 240 Broadway in West Brighton. The dispatch was for a non-responsive child. The prosecutor’s case was centered around Thompson and the baby’s mother, 38-year-old Jenice Lightfoot. According to the prosecution, they directly contributed to the baby’s death due to their mishandling of the critical situation.
The prosecution emphasized that the couple should have sought immediate medical help. Additionally, they argued that their choice of over-the-counter pain relief was improper and potentially dangerous for infants, a warning which was clarified on the product’s packaging. However, the city medical examiner’s bureau did not concur that the burns directly led to the baby’s death.
According to the medical examiner’s report, the cause of the infant’s tragic death was Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, commonly known as SIDS. This term is applied when the cause of an infant’s death remains indeterminate after a thorough investigation. Reacting to the verdict, Thompson’s attorney stated his client had experienced an indescribable loss with the death of his infant son that had simply been worsened by what he termed as an unjust prosecution.
In his statement, the defense lawyer surmised his client’s ordeal as one where accusations of deep-seated apathy were flung at him. In his defense, the attorney reiterated that Thompson was innocent of the charges of felony and expressed satisfaction with the court’s sensible and legally sound decision.
Post their arrest, the couple was arraigned as a unit in the Criminal Court. An emotional scene unfolded as Lightfoot, on her way into the courtroom, mouthed a silent ‘I love you’ in the direction of her family members seated in the public gallery. The couple seemed to register disbelief at their predicament, with Thompson visibly shaking his head as the officers led them out.
Ironically, only a month earlier, Thompson and Lightfoot had spent a joyous moment posing for photographs with their newborn. During this same period, Thompson was dealing with a separate, open misdemeanor case that arose from an altercation in a local homeless shelter.
Reacting to the unfolding events, family members painted a portrait of Lightfoot as a dedicated mother who was universally regarded as ‘always sweet.’ They reaffirmed her maternal instincts and abilities, stating unequivocally that she always put her children first. These descriptions were complemented by anecdotes of her stepping into a caretaker role within her own family.
This affable portrait of Lightfoot was further emphasized by one of her family members. They shared simply and joyously that knowing she was pregnant again had brought them happiness. Lightfoot, however, had pled guilty earlier in the year to charges of reckless endangerment. Consequently, she was handed a six-month jail sentence by Justice Jeong in February.
In an issued statement, the District Attorney remarked on Thompson’s verdict. He acknowledged that the decision might not deliver the complete justice they had aimed for, but importantly, it found the defendant guilty of a crime.
The District Attorney emphasized the significance of the conviction, acknowledging the guilt and bringing some degree of responsibility for the harm inflicted. He profoundly lamented the true victim in this tragic situation was an innocent infant. The victim had no advocate, no voice to claim justice for the injustice suffered. The DA acknowledged the profound grief and complexity of cases that unfairly impact the most innocent amongst us, our children.
The post West Brighton Father Acquitted of Severe Charges in Baby Boy’s Demise appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
